Sports A Field

A Really Big Tusker

Proof that giants still walk among us.

Photo above: Crossing the Tana River in Kenya with big ivory in the 1960s, a scene that will never be seen again. (Photo by John Dugmore)

On May 8, 2019, my old friend Michel Mantheakis from Tanzania and Namibian PH Koos Pienaar, hunting in Namibia’s eastern Caprivi, guided their client to an amazing elephant with the major tusk weighing 100 pounds. To me this is big news, and it is not sad news. This was not a known, named, or iconic park elephant; it was an exceptionally large elephant bull taken during a legal season in a hunting area that has a known overpopulation of elephants. Its harvest provides proof that giants still walk among us.

Tanzanian PH Michel Mantheakis with an exceptional tusker taken together with PH Koos Pienaar in Caprivi, May 2019. The major tusk is right at 100 pounds, a big elephant anywhere and a most unusual elephant in the southwest corner of Africa.

 

For more than a century, the Holy Grail of elephant hunting has been to find an elephant with one or both tusks exceeding the 100-pound mark. With older elephants, one tusk is often worn shorter or broken, suggesting the elephant was left- or right-tusked. The Rowland Ward records always recorded the weight of both tusks, but ranked their tables on the heaviest tusk. In more recent times they have changed this to ranking on the combined weight of both tusks. SCI listings also take the combined weight of both tusks. Either way, an elephant carrying 100 pounds of ivory on either side is an amazing creature. I have never seen such an elephant, and I probably never will, since I consider my elephant hunting in the past.

I have also never taken, and probably have never seen, a Boone and Crockett whitetail buck, but I know such exceptional animals exist. B&C’s position is that their records of North American big game exist not for glorifying the hunter, but because the presence of exceptionally large animals is an indicator of a herd’s overall health.

This bull is showing a lot of tusk length and he immediately catches your eye…but he’s a young bull and the tusks are very thin. Despite the length, there’s no weight here, less than 30 pounds in the visible tusk.

With elephants this is tricky, because, sadly, elephants have been greatly reduced in many areas once known to produce heavy ivory. While a “hundred-pounder” is the magical mark, historically they do get bigger. The heaviest tusks known were taken on the slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro in 1886, 226 and 214 pounds, the only tusks known to exceed 200 pounds. Rowland Ward lists two dozen elephants with one tusk exceeding 150 pounds; and 132 elephants with one tusk exceeding 120 pounds. Forty-six of these super-elephants came from Kenya, nineteen from Tanzania, eleven from C.A.R., and ten from Sudan. To some extent this reflects popularity of hunting areas, but of these four countries, only Tanzania still has a significant elephant population, and only Tanzania remains open to elephant hunting.

Next in line, with nine 120-pounders, is South Africa. The Kruger Park ecosystem is known to produce extra-large ivory (sometimes!), seemingly a mysterious and unknown combination of genetics, food, and minerals. When exceptional elephants are identified in Kruger, extreme measures are taken to protect them as national treasures, which I find appropriate. Also, in the areas around Kruger where elephants are hunted there is generally an upper limit on legal tusk size, to conserve the rare giants and their genes, which I also find appropriate.

As for the rest of the continent, there is no pattern of extra-large tuskers. Uganda is sixth with six 120-pounders, then D.R.C. (Zaire) with three, and then it’s ones and twos: Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Togo, Zimbabwe . . . and more than a dozen 120-pounders with origin unknown. Of these last countries mentioned, more than half have few elephants remaining.

Very significant to today’s elephant hunting: No elephants with a 120-pound tusk are known to have been taken in Angola, Botswana, Namibia, or Zambia. Botswana suspended safari hunting on government land five years ago, with the announcement just made that it will reopen to hunting. Botswana holds by far the continent’s largest elephant population, perhaps 250,000. They are overpopulated, with crop and habitat damage escalating rapidly. Under such conditions, elephant hunting is an almost essential management tool, and certainly this is great news. The elephant hunting will be spectacular, but we mustn’t think hundred-pounders will lurk behind every baobab tree. The track record just isn’t there.

Namibia’s Caprivi is a narrow strip of land with Botswana to the south, Angola to the northwest, and Zambia to the north. An elephant can walk across it overnight, and they do. The hundred-pounder just taken is not the only one from Namibia, but it’s the first I’ve heard of in a while. In 2010 PH Willy MacDonald guided a client to a 104×99 pounder in Botswana. This stands as the largest tusker since Botswana reopened elephant hunting in 1996. Botswana has an annual CITES quota of three hundred bulls, so this is one hundred-pounder in about five thousand bulls taken.

MacDonald was honest about the encounter. His client wanted to know how big it was; Willy told him he had no idea because he’d never seen such an elephant! It’s hard to judge any animal exponentially beyond your experience. I’m pretty good at whitetails from the 140s to 160s, but I doubt I could judge a 180-inch whitetail because I’ve never seen one, and probably never will. I know Koos Pienaar by reputation, and I’ve hunted elephants with Michel Mantheakis. He’s a careful and diligent hunter, and exceptionally good at judging quality. But, when they confronted this elephant, I don’t know if they recognized they were looking at the Holy Grail, or if they just knew, despite one broken tusk, it was too big to pass.

 A mature elephant in the 40-pound class.

The formula is simple: First, you estimate the length of ivory showing beyond the lip. Mantheakis is especially good at this because tusk length is one of Tanzania’s legal minimum standards (either length or weight). Then you estimate circumference at the lip. Angola/Caprivi/Botswana elephants are much bigger than Tanzanian elephants, typically with thicker ivory. Pienaar was on his home turf and would have known. The major tusk had 53 inches of ivory beyond the lip, with a circumference of 21.5 inches. Take exposed length in feet (53 divided by 12 equals 4.4 feet) times circumference in inches: 4.4 x 21.5 = 95 pounds. This odd math is usually very close; the unknown variable is the size of the nerve within the tusk. This bull had a small enough nerve to yield a bonus; it can just as easily go the other way. When Michel sent me a photo, I underestimated the circumference. My guess was way off, but I’m not Michel Mantheakis or Koos Pienaar, and I’ve never seen such an elephant.

Truth is, no modern hunters have experience judging this kind of elephant; they are just too uncommon. Historically, few ever did! But in the days when a really big tusker was a possible prize, there were professional hunters who specialized in seeking, finding, and hunting exceptional elephants.  Bror Blixen and Denys Finch-Hatton are said to be among them. For sure Eric Rundgren, who apprenticed under Blixen, was one of the best. I don’t think Harry Selby would have put himself in that company as a big elephant specialist, but perhaps he belongs. Selby guided Robert Ruark to an astonishing three hundred-pounders, and took quite a few with other clients. Selby’s next-door-neighbor in Maun, John Dugmore, apprenticed under Eric Rundgren, so there’s probably a pattern here. In Kenya’s latter days, Dugmore did a lot of horse-and-camel safaris in Kenya’s Northern Frontier District and guided clients to an exceptional number of big East African tuskers.

A big Kenya tusker with long East African ivory, right at 100 pounds. The cool thing about this photo is the rifle, an early Winchester Model 70 African in .458, so this photo is from about 1960, a time when big tuskers could be effectively sought…in the right places at the right time. (Photo by John Dugmore)

Unfortunately, the hunters who saw big tuskers in numbers are almost gone, and so are the big elephants they pursued. In the old days they theorized that an elephant bull grew a pound of ivory per year, so a hundred-pounder should be a century old. This is not true. It is true that elephants grow both body mass and ivory throughout their lives, although growth slows with age. Longevity is determined primarily by tooth wear. The elephant has six sets of molars that grow progressively into place. When the final set wears out, the animal will starve, usually in its sixties. In soft, loamy soil like the slopes of Kilimanjaro that produced the world record, tooth wear is retarded, and an elephant can theoretically live longer, but an elephant living a hundred years is somewhat less likely than you or I achieving that mark.

Elephants put on a lot of ivory in their middle years, easily two or three pounds per year. No elephants have been taken in Botswana for five full seasons, and it’s been ten years since I hunted there. This should mean a perfect young 40-pounder I passed ten years ago might carry 60- or 70-pound tusks today.

I hope so! I have no desire to hunt elephants again, but I want elephants to be properly managed. In the overpopulated southern Africa herds, carefully regulated hunting is an almost essential part of that management. After her five-year suspension, Botswana has come to that conclusion, in my view a wise decision for her people and her wildlife. Botswana not only has Africa’s largest elephant population, she also hosts Africa’s largest-bodied elephants, 7-ton giants standing 12 feet and more at the shoulder. They grow tusks that are typically short and thick, but only rarely attain extreme weight. But there are hundred-pounders out there, and when Botswana reopens, a few of them will be seen.

Emotions aside, where most elephant hunting is conducted today the elephants are overpopulated and must be managed, and recovery of all meat, which goes to local villages, is an important byproduct of the hunt.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Recent Record Book Entries

A new world-record tiny antelope and an unusual hyena were recently accepted into the Rowland Ward record book.

Interesting record book entries come in large, small, and unusual packages. In August 2018, Rowland Ward received a Top 10 entry for a large brown hyena submitted by Neville Boardman Jr., who shot the animal near Cumberland, South Africa, this past year.

The skull of the hyena measured 17 14/16 inches.

Years ago, hyenas were thought of as vermin and often shot on sight because they were considered cattle killers and hard on game in general.  Attitudes have changed, and now they are carefully managed in all countries with hunting programs and are on license almost everywhere. The most common variety is the spotted hyena, which makes hideous laughlike noises that remind some of a person gone insane.  They are the hyenas most often seen in African nature movies as they are active animals and not particularly shy. Unless hunted hard, they can often be seen during the day.

Two other varieties of hyenas are found in Africa: the brown and the striped. Both are much more reclusive, and permits for these varieties are not often available.  While the brown hyena is shy and not often seen, it can be a real nuisance around safari camps, coming in at night, breaking open supplies, and causing mayhem. It is thought that the jaws of a hyena are capable of exerting greater pressure per square inch than those of any other predator on Earth. Mr. Boardman’s brown hyena was an impressive specimen: The skull of this animal measures 17 14/16 inches and is potentially the new No. 2 record book entry.

Neville Boardman Jr. with his potential No. 2 brown hyena.

Recently Rowland Ward also received an entry for a new potential No. 1 dik-dik from Namibia.  Dik-diks are among the smallest of African horned game and belong to a class called the dwarf antelopes, which includes grysboks, klipspringers, oribis, royal antelope, and sunis, among others.  A general rule in Africa is: “The smaller it is, the quicker it runs and the more it hides,” and dik-diks are no exception.

Only one variety of dik-dik occupies the west side of Africa, the Damara dik-dik of Angola and Namibia.  The rest of the clan is found in East Africa, with a lot of them in the Horn of Africa. There are four species and some twenty subspecies, and nobody has ever shot them all, which tells you they don’t just stand around.  The name dik-dik is thought to have come from the sound they make (zhik-zhik)as they flee from predators.

The horn measurements of Potts’s dik-dik shattered the old world record by 1/8 inch.

A whopper of a male of any of the varieties of dik-dik might boast 3 inches of horn.  In fact, of all dik-diks ever recorded, only a handful are close to 4 inches. This potential new world record sports horns measuring 4 4/16 and 4 3/16 inches respectively, clearing the previous world record by 1/8 of an inch!  The hunter was Mr. Chrys Potts, and he was guided by Hugo Kotze from Namibia. The main target of the hunt was actually a leopard, but as the hunters were checking baits each day they saw numerous dik-diks about.  As so often happens in hunting, one day they chanced upon this outsize monster and shot it with a .22 Long Rifle.

 

Leave a Comment

Dr. Robert Speegle, 1925-2019

Influential Texas big-game hunter dies at 93.

Dr. Robert Speegle, better known to most as “Doc,” died on June 12, 2019. He was ninety-three. His legacy to the hunting world will probably never be fully measured, but his mark on his fellow hunters and all who knew him is indelible.

Bob Speegle was born in Hamlin, Texas, on December 2, 1925, and attended high school in Denison, Texas, where he became an Eagle Scout. In 1944, Bob served as a battlefield medic in Europe in World War II. He was a member of the 42nd Infantry Division, the presidentially cited Rainbow Division in France. While serving in Europe, he learned to speak Spanish and German. When he returned home, Bob went to the University of Texas at Austin on the GI Bill, and then studied medicine at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. He built the first hospital in Garland and practiced medicine until he was eighty-six years old.

Bob Speegle especially enjoyed the pursuit of mountain game.

Bob was a distinguished member of several medical professional organizations and an avid hunter, especially for mountain game, and was a DSC Life Member. Bob won many prestigious hunting and conservation awards including the Weatherby Award, the Conklin Award, and the Ovis Awards. He collected thirty-one huntable North American game animals with a rifle by age sixty-five, and then took up bow hunting and spent seventeen years accumulating twenty-nine huntable North American game animals with a bow. He is the only person to date to have accomplished this feat. Bob was also a member of Shikar Safari Club International and served as its president in 1983-84. From 1984 to 2017, he was chairman of the selection committee for the Weatherby Award. He has chaired DSC’s Outstanding Hunter Achievement Award from its inception until 2017. Bob had a great love for his family, for medicine, and for hunting. He is survived by his wife of sixty years, Linda Randolph Speegle, a daughter, grandchildren, and many others who will miss him. Bob leaves behind a host of friends and admirers, many of whom may never achieve his hunting record but will keep on trying to catch up.

 

Right: Bob Speegle with a black bear taken in 2018.

In tribute to Dr. Bob, Craig Boddington writes:

“In 1979, I attended my first Weatherby award banquet, then Roy Weatherby’s private party, held at the famous Beverly Hills Hotel. The winner that year was a young, energetic physician from Texas, Dr. Robert E. “Bob” Speegle.

“As an avid reader of the old Weatherby Guide, I knew who Dr. Speegle was, and that he’d been a nominee for Weatherby’s prestigious award for a full decade. Over time that became one of his favorite stories, told without much sympathy to succeeding generations of Weatherby hopefuls.

“In 1979, it could not be predicted that Speegle, respectfully known as “Doc,” would remain a pillar in our hunting community for another forty years. He was capable, determined, and tough. As longtime head of the Weatherby Selection Committee, Doc Speegle did much to establish ethical standards for international big game hunting. He was a leader, a hero, a true icon, and above all, a passionate hunter. We shall not see his like again.”

Dr. Speegle authored A Hunting Life and Two Exploratory Hunts in Asia, which is available from Safari Press, www.safaripress.com.

 

Leave a Comment

Paper Plate Accuracy

As long as you can keep your shots inside a paper plate, you’ll likely hit the vital zone.

 

With big-game animals it is always essential to hit a vital zone. Misses don’t count and near-misses are far worse than clean misses. For most of us the “vital zone” means center-chest, the heart and/or lung area. We can debate which is better, but a projectile through the heart or great vessels on top of the heart—or perforation of both lungs—is a hit that will very quickly be fatal. On larger, tougher animals one lung may not be enough, but, considering quadruped anatomy, a shot that catches just one lung wasn’t taken at a very good angle, and perhaps shouldn’t have been fired.

Paper plates are excellent for practicing shooting standing unsupported…something we should all do regularly. This is a Mossberg M64 .30-30 with factory iron sights.

Over the years I’ve talked to and gotten mail from a few hunters who maintain they “only” take brain/neck/spine shots. Such genuine specialists probably exist, but to my thinking a steady diet of head and neck shots would be practical and sustainable only under fairly controlled conditions that kept ranges fairly short. Or maybe these folks just shoot a lot better than I do! Seriously, stand hunters who do most of their hunting from the same stands season after season (especially over feeders or bait piles) have fairly controlled conditions. I’ve heard the same from hunters who hunt hogs with hounds. When a hog is at bay they’re able to get in very close. Some use handguns and a few, where legal, use knives and spears.

I hunt my Kansas whitetails from a daily choice of a couple dozen stands. None require long shots, but quite a few are in thick woods. I wouldn’t want to be held to the precise head or neck shot there, nor, honestly, anyplace else. My North American experience is mostly as a Western hunter, spot-and-stalk hunting that might yield almost any imaginable shot. Mountain hunting is the same the world over, and although long shots are unusual in Africa, you really don’t know what kind of a shot you might get. There are times and places where brain shots and neck shots are appropriate but for most situations I want the largest target possible—and that’s usually what I aim at.

The chest area of even smallish deer and pronghorns is actually a fairly large target. Worldwide there are a number of smaller “big-game” animals: Africa’s pygmy antelopes, the gazelles, European roebuck, muntjac, even our brocket deer and peccaries. However, across the board, the chest area offers the largest target, and as animals increase in size the target area just gets bigger.

An old adage is that “pie plate accuracy” is good enough. I wrote this not too long ago and a particularly precise reader took me to task, asking the exact size of the pie plate I’m talking about. I guess that’s actually a pretty good question because I don’t have a clue! I skipped home economics class and I’ve never baked a pie. I’ve also never shot at a pie plate and I don’t think Donna would be pleased if I did.

So, instead, and much less destructive, let’s talk about “paper plate accuracy” instead.  Turns out that’s not terribly precise, either. I got a tape measure and discovered that, right there in the kitchen cabinet, we have three different sizes of “big” paper plates: Nine, ten, and ten-and-a-half inches in diameter. So, when I say “paper plate accuracy” which size am I talking about?

It doesn’t matter! A nine-inch circle is plenty big enough, and another inch or so doesn’t matter. If you can keep your shots on the plate you should be able to keep them on your animal. You can, of course, draw a circle in the middle for a more precise aiming point. However, game animals don’t have bullseyes painted on their hides, so there’s training value in just shooting at the plate and trying to center it. Another old adage to “aim small, miss small” applies perfectly. All hits count, but central hits build confidence. At any distance your hits start wander off the plate, well, that distance should be your limit for shooting at game.

So, do my paper plates take the place of printed targets with precise aiming points? Heavens no! Paper plates are ridiculously cheap and printed targets are expensive—but I keep both on the range. I generally use the plates for short-range platforms: Iron sights, red dots, big bores that are unlikely to be used past a hundred yards. For precise zeroing and shooting the best groups possible there’s no substitute for real targets. Being lazy, I like the multi-color “splatter” targets that easily show bullet holes, and I also like a printed grid so that I can look through the spotting scope and count the inches I need to move the strike.

Hornady’s Birchwood targets are a favorite for zeroing and shooting tight groups, especially with high-magnification scopes. Squares and diamonds offer very precise aiming points, and the half-inch grid makes adjustments easy. This a Ruger No. One in .204 Ruger.

Exactly what kind of aiming point works best depends somewhat on reticle and magnification. For fine cross hairs, I prefer squares or diamonds. If you’re having trouble centering the square you can align your crosshairs on one of the corners.For coarser or illuminated reticles and red dots round aiming points are better for my eyes. I keep a stack of Birchwood Casey’s Dirty Bird splattering targets with a one-inch grid and five bullseyes (center and four quadrants), ideal for scoped rifles with modest magnification. For the most precise work I like Hornady’s Birchwood targets with small center diamond, four squares, and a half-inch grid.

Then there are paper plates. We also have plain old bull’s-eye targets in the range locker. However, during the last couple of years my near vision has slipped, causing increasing difficulty resolving iron sights. I have a hard time picking out a front sight against a black bull’s-eye—even when it’s a bold white or gold bead. For me, plain old white paper plates are easier and more visible for a consistent sight picture. The plates are round, as are most front sights. It is thus sort of an optical thing, at least two superimposed circles—and three with the open circle of an aperture sight. So, I’m doing most of my practice with open sights and apertures on paper plates—and I use them with red dots as well, from big-bore lever actions to double rifles.

I have to accept that my effective range with iron sights is greatly reduced from what it once was but, combining paper plates with a new eyeglass prescription, I’m seeing improvement I wasn’t sure I’d see again. And the rules for “paper plate accuracy” haven’t changed: Whether for sighting equipment, visual acuity, unsteadiness, or the inaccuracy of the firearm, at whatever distance shots start to wander off the plate, I’m done.

Paper plate groups with this Savage 99 in .300 Savage weren’t impressive but, honestly, that’s about as well as I could see the sights. I was able to keep shots reasonably in the center of the plate…and that’s plenty good enough for close-range hunting.

Last year I came into a vintage Savage 99 in .300 Savage with aperture sights. 1920 forerunner to the .308, the .300 Savage is definitely a 200-yard cartridge, but with aperture sights I no longer have 200-yard vision. Working out on paper plates, at 50 yards I could keep my shots well-centered. Mind you, with aperture sights I can no longer determine how accurate a rifle is or isn’t—but I had pig hunting in mind, so I was thinking “minute of plate” equaled “minute of pig.” My hundred-yard plates weren’t impressive—but I was still minute of pig, and I figured that would work fine.

In the field it’s just like combat: The best plans go awry when the first shot is fired. I missed an easy shot at 60 yards, dark animal in dark shadow, probably shot over. So much for all my paper plate drills, not impressive. Figured it was just me, and I figured right. Just at sunset I rolled a hog, quartering away at 125 yards. Another evening I shot another pig at about 100 yards. Still minute of pig.

Back when I could reallysee iron sights the Winchester Model 71 in .348 was a favorite. I haven’t had one for a while, but I just picked up a 1937 M71 with factory aperture on the bolt. With Hornady’s new LeveRevolution .348 load it passed the paper plate drill just fine. I think I’ll take it black bear hunting in a couple of weeks.

Animal silhouette targets are excellent, especially for inexperienced hunters because animals don’t have aiming points. This is a 100-yard group with my .30-30 Trapper with aperture sights…shot when I could see iron sights much better. A group like this is no longer possible with irons!

 

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Don’t Overlook the .30-06

Despite all the emphasis on new cartridges, this old standby is still an all-round champ.

The cartridge wars continue! The 6.5mm Creedmoor remains a hot seller. Many of us want more, so we turn to faster cartridges. We used to call them “magnums” and most of them wore belts. The belt never meant much, but I guess we over-used the word “magnum.” Now we call our fast cartridges all sorts of things: Compact, Precision, Short, Ultra, more. They’re all good. Thanks to the proliferation of chronographs, today’s data, published factory ballistics and handloading data, is very accurate. Today’s cartridges do pretty much what they’re supposed to do.

This “raghorn” Montana bull was taken with a tough downhill shot at 350 yards. The rifle is a Savage 116 in .30-06, always a great choice for elk.

 

More important is to not get too caught up in hype and decide what level of performance you need, and how much recoil you’re comfortable withstanding. Performance isn’t free! The 6.5mm Creedmoor is an awesome long-range target cartridge. It is nota long-range hunting cartridge, moderate in both bullet weight and energy. It’s a fine cartridge for deer-size game, and it’s adequate for elk, but only to very medium range. The many faster cartridges project more energy farther downrange, but always at a price in increased recoil (and often action length and gun weight).

Without question long-range shooting is “in,” but not everybody wants to shoot at extreme range, and many who wish to have no business trying! Despite all the current malarkey, there is a tried-and-true veteran cartridge that performs extremely well on fairly large game as far out as most of us really shoot, and has done so for more than a century. Many of you have one, but if you don’t, I’ll bet your dad or granddad did. It is the .30-06 Springfield, properly the “Ball Cartridge, caliber .30, model of 1906.” It served us well through two World Wars and Korea, countless smaller actions, and although technically replaced by the 7.62x51mm NATO (.308 Winchester) in 1957, the .30-06 continued in various roles throughout the Vietnam conflict. Over time it became America’s most popular sporting cartridge and remains among our perennial best-sellers. Despite the dozens and dozens of newer cartridges, many of which are faster and some more efficient, the .30-06 remains one of our very best all-around choices. Jack O’Connor, champion of the .270, was also a lifelong .30-06 fan, and conceded privately that the .30-06 was “more versatile” than his beloved .270.

The unusual and little-known red buffalo of northern Angola. Killed by Geoge Parker with a .30-06 during an expedition to Angola in 1952.

The .30-06 is no pipsqueak. Bullets and velocities changed over its 50-year service life, but the .30-06 was the most powerful cartridge ever adopted by a major military. Generations of recruits whined about its brutal recoil! It is an awesome deer cartridge. However, .30-06 power is not really needed for any North American deer hunting. Eleanor O’Connor, herself an especially accomplished hunter, was a 7×57 fan. She considered the .30-06 a cannon, but that’s what she chose for hunting tigers and, with a 220-grain solid, she took her elephant with a .30-06. My old friend George Parker, contemporary of O’Connor, put more Coues whitetails in Boone and Crockett than anyone else, eightbetween 1926 and 1969. A distinguished competitive shooter as well as a hunter, George told me that he wasn’t crazy about recoil. For his deer hunting he came to prefer a .25-06. For bigger game he preferred a .30-06, which he used on several African safaris and a long sojourn in Southeast Asia with his lifelong buddy Colonel Charles Askins

George Parker’s “pet” was a .30-06 Improved, body taper removed for increased powder capacity. Velocity increase with an improved chamber depends a lot on the rifle and who is doing the loading; sometimes there’s a substantial gain and sometimes not. Either way, in the rarified world of magnum cartridges the .30-06 is not a speed demon—but it is not “slow.” And its trajectory is flatter than you might think. For many years standard .30-06 loads with 180-grain bullets have yielded 2,700 fps. Guess what? That’s exactly the same velocity as the vaunted 6.5mm Creedmoor with a 140-grain bullet. Use an aerodynamic 180-grain .30-caliber bullet with a Ballistic Coefficient up into the .500 range and your trajectory will be almost the same as the Creedmoor with a 140-grain bullet. However, I can assure you the 180-grain .30-caliber bullet will hit a whole lot harder! It will also kick more, which is why I suggest that it’s not essential for deer, and why I prefer 6.5mms, .270s, and 7mms for my deer hunting.

An advantage to cartridges with long-term popularity is availability: Everyone loads .30-06 and there are hundredsof factory loads. Another advantage is continued development, both in factory ammo and handload recipes. If the .30-06 sounds too slow to you it can be juiced up a bit. In preparation for my first African safari I handloaded 180-grain Nosler Partitions to 2,800 fps. Although I used that load for years with no pressure signs, it’s no longer on today’s charts. However, depending on which manual, there are still published loads that break 2,800 fps with a 180-grain bullet. There are also extra-fast” factory loads. In their Superformance line Hornady’s 180-grain SST load is rated at 2,820 fps; their 165-grain SST is rated at 2,960 fps, edging into .300 short magnum territory.

This sable antelope was taken in Mozambique with a Ruger M77 .30-06 firing 180-grain Interlock bullets. An advantage to the .30-06 is that all .30-caliber hunting bullets are intended for .30-06 velocities, so excellent bullet performance is routine.

I’ll be honest, I rarely choose the .30-06 for mountain game. However, you certainly can. O’Connor took several of his early sheep with a .30-06, as did my uncle, Art Popham—and their (and my) mutual friend John Batten. Back in the 1950s Grancel Fitz was the first person known to take all North American species. He used a Griffin & Howe Springfield .30-06, including for all four sheep. Much more recently, J.Y. Jones (One Man, One Rifle, One Land) used a battered Remington .30-06 to take all North American species, also including all four sheep. Personally, I consider mountain hunting a specialized pursuit and I think there are better tools. So, I usually use faster cartridges. Magnum .30-calibers are frequent choices, but sheep and goats don’t really require .30-caliber power, so I have also chosen faster 6.5mm, .270, and 7mm cartridges.

Obviously, the .30-06 could be used, but I think it’s better suited to somewhat larger game or situations where its versatility really shines. The .30-06 is a fantastic elk cartridge. I’ve hunted elk with a lot of cartridges from .270 upwards, but I’ve taken more bulls with the .30-06 than anything else. It hits hard, and has all the range I really need. One subzero day in northern Colorado I crawled in to about 125 yards and shot a medium-sized 6×6 on the shoulder with a 180-grain Barnes X. The bull dropped so hard it bounced and never moved. Another time, in Montana, I had a tough downhill shot at about 350 yards which, despite all the stuff, is not a close shot. The .30-06 came through just fine!

I’ve used the .30-06 on all the continents, but where it really shines is in Africa because: 1) You never know what you might run into. The .30-06 handles all the non-dangerous species just fine, from very small all the way up! The exception is eland, but a .30-06 with a good bullet will handle an eland. 2) Long-range shooting as we think of it is very rare in Africa; the .30-06 shoots plenty flat enough for any African hunt or area I’ve experienced. 3) On the typical plains game safari you may shoot every day, and sometimes a few times a day. Recoil can be cumulative! A hard-kicking .300 may be fine on a one-animal hunt, but unless you’re really comfortable with it, daily shooting can be a different deal. 4) In my opinion the .30-06 is perfect for leopard, and in my experience more effective than larger cartridges like the .375s, which are better-suited for much larger game.

Donna Boddington and PH Dirk de Bod with a fine leopard, dropped “dead under the tree” with a 180-grain Interlock from a Ruger .30-06. Boddington believes the .30-06 is perfect for leopard, and more effective than larger cartridges.

Now, to be absolutely fair and impartial, everything said about the .30-06 can be equally applied to the .308 Winchester. Because of greater case capacity, the .30-06 runs at least 100 to 150 fps faster than the .308 with all bullet weights, the gap widening with heavier bullets. So, the .30-06 shoots flatter and delivers more energy. Most game animals won’t notice the difference. The .30-06 also kicks more, requires a longer action, and on average isn’t quite as accurate. I prefer the .30-06, but if you prefer the .308 you won’t get any argument out of me.

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Thomas Mattanovich: 1937-2019

The hunting world has lost a pioneer.

Thomas Mattanovich, “dean” of professional hunters in Ethiopia, passed after a long battle with Parkinson’s disease on 17 February. He was 82.

Thomas immigrated to Ethiopia with his parents and elder brother in 1950 at age 13 from what was then Yugoslavia.They settled in Wondo Genet, southern Ethiopia, then a very remote and wild place. Thomas adapted quickly, and while still a boy, he learned the first of three Ethiopian languages he would become fluent in.

As a teenager, after training and employing a team of local Anuak tribesmen to be boatmen and skinners, Thomas hunted crocodiles on the Baro River. The salted and dried skins were then exported to Italy via Ethiopian Airlines.

Receiving his Professional Hunter’s license in 1959, Thomas pioneered hunting in the Gambella region, which is home to the great migration of white-eared kob and Nile lechwe, the second largest migration of wildlife on the continent. He trained and employed a number of local people, and as they and their families settled around his original safari camp, it gradually grew to become a small village.  Government maps of the Haile Selassie era identify the location officially as “Tom’s Camp,” perhaps the only place on the entire map of Ethiopia having a non-native name.

Thomas went on to hunt throughout the country, and was among the first to conduct safaris for the rare desert species of the Danakil and Ogaden regions of eastern Ethiopia, as well as the endemic species like mountain nyala and Menelik bushbuck in the Arussi and Chercher Mountains.

Thomas guided everyone from European royalty to a logger from Washington state, and many returned to Ethiopia to hunt with him multiple times. He guided 19 hunters that went on to win the Weatherby Award. His clients have put over 100 trophies in Rowland Ward’s Records of Big Game,and though he ceased active guiding in 2003, a dozen-plus of those entries still rank in the current Top Ten.
Thomas was a life member of the International Professional Hunter’s Association, and an active member of Game Conservation International, a precursor to today’s hunting and conservation organizations. He participated in and contributed his invaluable knowledge and experience with the diverse wildlife, habitat, and people of Ethiopia to the numerous conservation projects conducted during his life.

Thomas is buried in the Petros we Paulos Cemetery, in Gulele, Addis Ababa. He is survived by his wife, Samrawit, three children, and two grandchildren.

Leave a Comment

Close Encounters with Buffalo

The classic way to shoot a Cape buffalo is up close with a double rifle, but that’s not always possible.

As the herd moved closer, our little tree seemed to offer less cover. At thirty yards the group split; we had buffalo passing to the right at twenty yards, and another bunch coming straight toward us on the left. The breeze was strong on my face, quartering slightly from right to left. The buffalo to the right were good, and for the moment we were OK on the left, but as they strung past they would eventually catch our wind. We needed to make a decision before that happened.

I was hunting in Namibia’s Caprivi Strip (now officially known as the Zambezi Region) with Dawid Muller. In arid Namibia, buffalo habitat is limited to the well-watered Caprivi and a few other spots in the north. This means buffalo permits are limited, but with little hunting and good genetics, horn quality is very good. Muller’s Daggaboy Safaris, with his concession sandwiched between two parks, has one of the larger quotas. Because of small supply (and plenty of demand), Namibian buffalo are a bit pricier than some other areas.

On the other hand, Namibia has an unusual system. The northern areas are conservancies, pooled tribal and private lands. In addition to trophy permits for both buffalo and elephant, there is an “own use” quota. This is not the same as “non-trophy” permits or “PAC” (Problem Animal Control), both of which have been experimented with (and sometimes abused) in other countries. “Own use” means the meat must be recovered and distributed, and nothing is exportable. The intent, however, is to take animals with worn or broken horns (or tusks), or animals unlikely to grow them.

So, in 2018, I had an “own use” buffalo permit. And I knew that, hunting in Dawid’s area with his team, we’d get close to buffalo. Right now we seemed to be plenty close, but soon the leaders on the left were sure to get our scent. Several young bulls with good horns had passed. The hope was some older bulls might be trailing the herd, but we were running out of time. Then, with buffalo on both sides almost close enough to touch, we saw him coming. He wasn’t an old bull, but he was mature, with narrow, ugly horns. I stepped into the clear with my double .450; the shot was about ten yards.

As buffalo exploded everywhere, this bull shrugged off the 480-grain bullet with almost no reaction and tried to run with the herd. He lagged behind in just a few dozen yards; as soon as he was clear I shot again, and he went down with no incident.

Few things are more exciting than getting really close to buffalo like that. This is the romantic concept of buffalo hunting that we all dream of, up close and personal with a big-bore rifle. The only thing is, it’s a difficult thing to orchestrate, a matter of time and place and luck. Time: We had it right, with the herd drifting slowly past, but in seconds the front of the herd was sure to get our scent and there would have been no shot at all. Place: Where buffalo occur in Namibia, they’re fairly plentiful. Muller’s area adjoins Botswana, with big herds coming and going. With a limited quota, the buffalo receive little pressure and, while lions are present, they are not plentiful. So these buffalo are fairly calm.

The calmer the buffalo, the closer you can get, but even under the best of circumstances it takes some luck to get a very close shot. The more buffalo in a group, the harder it is to get close! Terrain and vegetation obviously make a huge difference. Much of Muller’s area looks like a sea of grass, and in fact all low areas remain flooded long after the rains. Even so, there are lots of little folds and hummocks hidden in the grass, and quite a few termite mounds, plus the occasional tree and small patches of brush. In my limited experience there, it is possible to get reasonably close without crawling. You still need luck with the wind and the fortuitous location of those scattered trees and clumps of bush.

An experienced hunting team is also a factor. A couple of years earlier, the first time I hunted with Dawid Muller, I had a regular permit. We got onto three bachelor bulls, much easier to close with than a mixed herd. Although the sea of grass looks the same to you and me, apparently the buffalo often graze in consistent patterns, flowing along almost invisible channels. Minding the wind, we made a big circle—walking, never crawling—and came in behind a little patch of thorn. We stood for a few minutes, and then the three bulls appeared in our laps. I shot the best bull at about twenty-five yards. That time I used a Krieghoff double .500 with open sights.

Boddington’s first Namibian buffalo, hunting with PH Dawid Muller, was taken at about twenty-five yards in seemingly open country. He used a Krieghoff double in .500 3-inch, one shot and down.

It was truly a classic encounter, and although I’m getting sketchy with open sights, I can still handle a shot like that. Over the years I’ve been that close to buffalo many times, but it isn’t easy. In 2018 I carried a Sabatti double in .450 3¼-inch, but, thinking that close shot might have been a fluke, I hedged my bet with an Aimpoint Micro H-2 sight. Of course, at ten yards I could have made the shot without optics–but how do you know?

I have much more experience with buffalo in the Zambezi Valley and in coastal Mozambique. The Valley is difficult to characterize. The bush is uniformly thick and there are plenty of lions and quite a bit of hunting pressure. Getting within twenty-five yards of a buffalo is difficult and unusual, but I’ve seen many shooting opportunities within fifty or sixty yards. On the other hand, there are scattered openings, broad sand rivers, and some significant ridges and ravines. It depends on where you catch your buffalo, but hundred-yard shots are not uncommon.

There was a time (not so long ago) when I could reliably shoot that far with open sights. Many can’t, and today I can’t resolve them well enough. True, most PHs use open sights, but their job isn’t to shoot the buffalo; it’s to stop it. As Zim PH Andrew Dawson said years ago, it’s perfectly OK to use iron sights if you wish–just understand you’re giving up 60 percent of your shooting opportunities. Sometimes you just can’t get as close as you’d like.

Coastal Mozambique is a different story. The majority of the buffalo are in the swamps and floodplains in and around the Marromeu Reserve. This country is dead-flat. Papyrus channels and sawgrass flats are interspersed with broad short-grass savannas. Strands of papyrus and fingers of sawgrass offer marvelous cover for stalking, but the buffalo like to graze and bed on the savannas. There are almost no lions out in the swamp and, with over 25,000 buffalo, the harvest is insignificant. These are the calmest buffalo I have ever hunted. However, you can’t just walk up to them, and most of the hunting is in big herds, lots of eyes and ears. Crawling is usually required, and everyone carries gloves and kneepads. This is fun buffalo hunting, but the downside is the shots are, on average, the longest I’ve seen. In a dozen straight years of hunting these swamp buffalo I’ve seen few shots at less than fifty yards. The average is probably ninety to one hundred yards, still possible with open sights, but there are situations where it is essential to reach out beyond a hundred yards. This is no longer open-sight territory! I love the red-dot sights and often use an Aimpoint. However, in coastal Mozambique, you are almost always sorting your way through big herds. Picking out the bulls is difficult—and then you and your PH must pick out the right bull. You will use your binocular, and a low-power riflescope is probably the best choice.

Of course, you can always pass on a shot and wait for a close encounter. That depends on how big the bull, how much time you have and, realistically, how hot and tired you are after crawling hundreds of yards in the hot sun with no shade for many miles. It is a marvelous experience to have a close-range encounter with a buffalo and take him down with a classic iron-sighted big bore. Just understand this won’t happen all the time. Regardless of where you’re hunting, you will take more and bigger buffalo bulls with optical sights, and, overall, kill them more cleanly.

 

Leave a Comment

Giant Rams of Montana, Vol. 1

New book by Montana hunter celebrates the impressive bighorn sheep of Big Sky Country.

Anyone who is fascinated by bighorn sheep, and especially big rams, will be intrigued by this fascinating new book by Butte, Montana, author John “Timmer” Reeves. Giant Rams of Montana, Vol. 1, is a 272-page softcover book containing a collection of stories and full-color photos of the largest bighorns ever taken in Montana.

The book begins with the story of the new world record bighorn ram, found dead on Wild Horse Island and certified as a record in 2018. The rest of the book is a wonderful collection of first-person hunting stories, told by the successful sheep hunters themselves, with impressive color photos of each ram. Included are 16 rams with scores over 200 B&C, 14 rams scoring between 180 and 190 B&C, and 8 rams scoring over 180 B&C.

Later chapters include stories of other sheep hunts that may not have resulted in rams scoring in the top echelons of the record books, but were nonetheless exciting and meaningful to the fortunate hunters. The last section of the book includes descriptions of Montana’s sheep hunting districts, a listing of the top Montana rams from the B&C record book as of 2018, and information on the Wild Sheep Foundation and the Montana Wild Sheep Foundation.

Montana really is the Land of Giant Rams, and Giant Rams of Montana, Vol. 1, is a must-have addition to any sheep aficionado’s library.

Leave a Comment

Settling the Score

The 30th Edition of Rowland Ward’s Records of Big Game will debut a new way of scoring African buffalo.

Go on a Cape buffalo safari almost anywhere in Africa, and you will hear professional hunters talk about a “38-inch bull” or say, “I saw one today I am sure would go over 40.” Since African sport hunting began, more than a century ago, a buffalo with a horn spread of 40 inches or more has been considered a very good head.  Spread means how far the horns extend in a straight line at a 90-degree angle from the skull–not total length of the horns from the tip around the horn toward the skull. In most hunting grounds in Africa, obtaining a head with 40 inches of spread or more is not easy, even in the those areas with the best trophy potential, such as Zambia and Tanzania. The Rowland Ward minimum for inclusion in its record book has, for decades, been 42 inches of spread. Rowland Ward measurers have also always recorded the width of the bosses and the straight-line, tip-to-tip spread, as supplemental information.

In the past two years the editors of Rowland Ward held many in-depth discussions with biologists, game department officials, client-hunters, and professionals alike to determine what would encourage the best management practices for buffalo herds and their age structure and what measurements would reflect the most desirable buffalo trophy and, above all, encourage the shooting of older bulls.  By about age seven, the spread of a buffalo is set.  At that age, its overall horn length (if measured from the tip of the horn curling back toward the skull) is probably at peak.  But the bosses are still “green,” or soft, and have not formed into a hard keratin material, which only happens when the buffalo reaches nine or ten  years of age, according to Dr. Kevin Robertson.  As a result of these discussions, in the upcoming edition of Rowland Ward’s Records of Big Game, Cape, Nile, and Central African buffaloes will be ranked on a total score that includes spread and the width of both bosses.

Rowland Ward does not allow for the measuring of green boss material, nor should it, as it occurs exclusively in up-and-coming bulls that are yet to become herd bulls–that is, the males that do most of the breeding. In extraordinary cases, some buffalo grow “airplane wing” horns that extend out and down to form horns that are shaped somewhat akin to the bottom end of the paddle of a canoe; very flat, thin, wide, and often curled. Such animals, even when very old, have almost no bosses, and often they are hermaphrodites, or bulls that have had their reproductive organs injured through fighting or predators.  Such heads may have a very large spread.  Under the new ranking system, however, such heads will drop down considerably in the ranks, because they have little or no bosses.

By combining the spread measurement, plus the width of the two bosses, Records of Big Gamewill encourage the harvesting of older bulls and emphasize the attributes that hunters like best in Cape buffalo: spread and hard bosses.  The changes will be implemented in the 30thedition of Records of Big Game, which comes out in November 2019.

This “airplane-wing” buffalo was shot shortly after WW II by Clary Palmer-Wilson, in Tanzania.  With its exceptional spread (64 inches) the head scored at the top of the list for several decades. The animal has virtually no bosses and, in fact, had been castrated in an accident many years before.
This buffalo was shot in 1973 in Kenya by Karl Flick, on the right, seen here with PH Robin Hurt.  It has exceptional bosses and superb spread (54 inches). Under the new ranking system, it will score well above the Palmer-Wilson head.

Leave a Comment

The Future of Hunting

Hunter numbers have declined in the last few decades, but wildlife advocates are working hard to turn the tide.

Photo by Vic Schendel

Hunters are a distinct minority in today’s world. Recent data from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service suggest that there are about 15.4 million hunters in the U.S.–that’s only about 4.9 percent of the population. This is down from an estimated 16.2 million hunting license holders in 1980–6.87 percent of the U.S. population.

Before you get secretly excited that fewer hunters in the woods means a higher probability of success for you next hunting season, here’s a wake-up call: The exact opposite is true. Hunting license sales and federal excise taxes on hunting equipment provide the primary source of funding for wildlife conservation and habitat. This money amounts to 80 percent of the funding for state fish and wildlife agencies, and they are the primary managers and caretakers of our wildlife resources. If this funding decreases, our wildlife populations could go downhill, fast.

Numerous initiatives have sprung up with the goal of reversing the decline in hunter numbers. Chief among them are what’s being called “R3,” short for recruitment, retention, and reactivation. These efforts, spearheaded by fish and wildlife agencies and local and national conservation groups, include youth outreach, “Learn to Hunt” days, and mentoring programs. Among the more successful of these programs are the National Archery in the Schools Program, the Scholastic Clay Target Program, and the Becoming an Outdoors-Woman program.

These are all fantastic efforts, but they tend to be somewhat localized, and often the people they reach are those who are already hunters or who come from a hunting family. In an effort to widen these efforts and make them more effective, a coalition of state agencies, conservation groups, and industry partners combined to form the Council to Advance Hunting and the Shooting Sports (CAHSS). Research and resources provided by CAHSS are helping to develop and implement more effective programs to reach potential new members of the hunting community. (To learn more, see cahss.org.)

These are excellent efforts and badly needed. As I see it, there is also a “fourth R”–recognition–that should go hand-in-hand with the R3 efforts. Reaching out to potential new hunters is crucial, but so is addressing the overwhelming percentage of non-hunters with a positive message about hunting. Not everyone wants to become a hunter, but everyone should have the opportunity to learn why hunting is important to wildlife conservation and our economy, and they will be far more likely to support it at the ballot box, online, and in person.

A great example of a “fourth R” program is Colorado’s “Hug a Hunter” TV ad campaign, which is targeting general audiences watching network television during prime time with a friendly, pro-hunting message that is resonating with a non-hunting urban audience. A group called the Nimrod Society is working to get these pro-hunting ad campaigns started in other states. (To learn more, see nimrodsociety.org.)

All of these are efforts that hunters should wholeheartedly get behind. Hunter numbers are dwindling and public support for hunting is declining. Let’s work together, now, to turn the tide.

Leave a Comment

tablet

Never Miss An Issue!Subscribe Now: 6 Issues for $34.97

More Details
WordPress Video Lightbox Plugin