Sports A Field

Selous Gets Lost

Before he became the most famous hunter of the Victorian Era, Frederick Selous nearly met his end when he ended up lost and alone in the wilderness of southern Africa.

He would eventually become one of the most famous and accomplished hunters of his time and a man of many distinctions, but in 1872 Frederick Courteney Selous was only nineteen years old and had just recently arrived in South Africa. It was his first visit to the continent he had read and dreamed about while growing up in England, and his first venture into the “far interior,” which was largely unmapped and roadless except for a few rutted wagon-track paths. Young Fred’s plan was to explore with three new-met friends, hunt as much as possible, and make money shooting and trading for ivory, which at that time was still considered a legitimate–and sometimes profitable–profession.

On horseback, with ox-drawn wagons full of trade goods and a retinue of native helpers, Selous and his cronies labored their way north from Port Elizabeth, a trek of some months with many delays and hardships. Around mid-August the men followed the wagon track into country ruled by the Matabele tribe although, except for a few scattered Bushmen, the area seemed largely uninhabited. At a place called Shakani, where there were two “pretty vleys” (shallow ephemeral lakes), they stayed for a week. Each day Selous rode out with one or more companions in search of game. He wrote, “we always guided ourselves back by a low range of hills that ran parallel with the [wagon track] road, behind the vleys, and particularly by one single hill that stood by itself.” In modern terms, they were using these hills as a baseline that could be followed to find their way back to camp, and the single rock-mound hill (or kopje) was a landmark that stood out in otherwise homogenous terrain.  

Leaving Shakani, they continued northward, and after a four-hour trek reached Lemouni Pan, a large, open piece of ground surrounded by thick forest and scrubby brush. During the dry season it was almost destitute of water. August is mid-winter at that latitude, and though the sun was hot during the day–as hot as summer in England, Selous thought–the nights “were intensely cold, and tea left in the kettle was often frozen.” 

Just before dawn one day, being completely out of meat, Selous and two companions decided to ride out on horseback in search of game. “So, hastily drinking a cup of hot coffee, we saddled up our horses and started.” 

This would be his first serious mistake: taking off for the hunt with no thought of preparation and adequate equipment–not even a compass, or food and water, or a coat and blanket, or matches. After all, they were only going out for a half-day jaunt.

Early that morning they came upon some hartebeest, and wounding one, went on a long chase after it, finally losing the animal in thick woods. Thinking they were riding parallel to the main wagon track, they continued on until afternoon, seeing no game. About to give up and head back to the road, they spotted several giraffes in the distance, “their heads appearing amongst the tops of the trees. We at once started in eager pursuit, hoping to secure some steaks for supper, as giraffes are splendid eating … and their fat is a luxury that no one can properly appreciate till he has lived for a time on nothing but the dry meat of the smaller antelopes.” 

Selous and his friends galloped toward the herd of about twenty animals, which took off with their gliding gait. “At a hard gallop, they can spin along for miles, and so we found today. After an hour or so [of chasing them on horseback at top speed] the giraffes separated and I found myself lying on my back, with my right leg nearly broken, by coming violently into contact with the trunk of a tree.” When Selous managed to rise, the giraffes were gone, and so were his companions.

A portrait of Frederick Selous as a young man. He arrived in Africa from England at the age of nineteen, where he discovered he had a lot to learn about wilderness survival.

Thinking they too must have given up the chase, he fired a signal shot and immediately heard an answering report to his right. He rode in that direction for some distance “and shouted with all my might,” but received no reply. He fired another shot, without effect. His horse was worn out from the hard chase, so he unsaddled for a time and attempted a third signal shot. He “listened intently for an answer, but all was silent as the grave; so, as the sun was now low, I saddled up again and struck a line for the wagon road, thinking my friends had already done the same thing.” 

He kept riding, very slowly, on his spent, thirsty horse, as the sun sank on the horizon and finally disappeared. The moon was bright but the temperature was lowering fast. “Still thinking I must be close to the road, I kept on for a couple of hours or so, when, it being intensely cold, I resolved to try and light a fire and pass the night where I was. Having no matches, in endeavoring to get a light I had to make use of my cartridges, of which I had only three remaining.” He broke one of these open, rubbed some gunpowder into a piece of linen torn from his shirt, dropped it into the muzzle of his rifle and tried to ignite it with the percussion cap. He managed to get a bit of dry grass smoldering, but “could not for the life of me make it flare, and soon had the mortification of finding myself, after two more unsuccessful attempts, just as cold and hungry as before, and minus my three cartridges to boot. Were the same circumstances to occur again, no doubt everything would be different; but at the time I was quite a tyro in all forest lore.” 

It was now very cold. His clothing consisted of a hat, shirt, trousers, and light shoes. Using his hat for a pillow, he pulled the saddle over his chest and hoped to “fall asleep and forget my cares; vain indeed, for the bitter cold crept in … from my feet upwards, til I was soon shivering from head to foot as if my very life depended upon it.” After two hours of this he could bear it no longer and struggled, stiffly, to get up. He ran back and forth in the moonlight until he was reasonably warm again, then lay down. In this manner he passed the long, frigid night.

At dawn he saddled up and rode, very slowly, on his poor horse, which was too fatigued and dehydrated to move faster. Coming near a high tree, he climbed it to look for a recognizable landmark. But “on every side the country was covered with forest, and in the distance were several low ranges of hills, yet nothing seemed familiar to my eye.” Spotting a lone kopje, he rode for it, passing “three beautiful gemsbuck, which allowed me to come quite close to them, though they are usually very wild; but they had nothing to fear from me, as I had no cartridges, and so could do nothing more than admire them.” 

Then it struck him: he must have already ridden across the narrow wagon-track road last evening in the moonlight, when it would have been easy to miss. He became so sure of this he turned his horse around and rode back in the direction from which he’d just come. This is typical lost-person behavior, changing or reversing course on a sudden whim, filled with doubt and anxiety-based impatience, wanting to locate something recognizable, to once again feel safely re-oriented. Very often this leads people to change course just before they are about to reach the very place–the trail or turn or fork or road–they are seeking. 

Selous kept on until midday, but there was still no road. “I began to think that I was in stern reality lost in the veldt, without even a bullet to obtain food for myself, and no water within heaven knew what distance away, except the far-apart drinking-places along the road. And where was that road–was it behind me or in front?” 

Seeing another kopje, he climbed it for a look around. “A most bewildering prospect it was–a vast ocean of forest on all sides, as far as the eye could reach; but nowhere could I make out a landmark to guide me in the least.” He did see, in the direction from which he’d just come, a thin line of blue smoke curling up from the trees–which he took to indicate a wood fire made by a native who could probably guide him to safety. So he remounted his beleaguered horse, turned it around once again, and rode back in the direction of the smoke, now believing that the road had in fact been behind him. Recounting this later, Selous interjects, “I may here say that as I afterward found out, I never had crossed the road in the night, but must twice have turned and ridden away when within but a short distance [of it].” 

Nearing where he thought the wood fire should be, he climbed a tall tree and searched, but could find no trace of smoke or human. Discouraged–and probably more worried and frightened than he admits in his narrative–he tried to keep his spirits up by imagining “how I should enjoy a cup of tea and a damper with my companions round the campfire.” (A frequent tactic of survivors is using pleasant imaginings and other goads to restore motivation while staving off panic and despair.) But “as the sun dipped lower and lower in the western sky, my spirits sank with it, and at last when it finally disappeared, I had to prepare for a second night on the bare ground, without food, water, fire, or blanket.”

Since his depleted horse had eaten nothing all day, he decided to hobble it with rawhide thongs rather than tie it to a tree, hoping the animal might forage during the night and gain some strength for the next day. “It was full moon, and fearfully cold, from which, in addition to hunger and thirst, I suffered intensely, almost shivering myself to pieces; but everything has an end in this world, and so had this most intolerably long winter’s night.” 

At the first streak of dawn he tried to rise, but his legs were numb with cold. Eventually he restored enough circulation to stand, look around, and realize his horse was gone. Though tightly hobbled, the animal was so parched it must have hopped and shuffled off in search of water, despite the crippling restraints. Selous tried tracking it for a short while but the ground was so hard and dry he couldn’t find adequate spoor. Now he was lost and unequipped–and on foot. It had been forty-eight hours since any food or liquid passed his lips. But “all that day I walked as I have seldom walked since, only resting at long intervals for a few minutes at a time, devoured by a burning thirst and growing sensibly weaker from hunger.” 

Near sunset he climbed a steep hill, pausing every few steps to pant and rest, only to reach the top and see “nothing but range upon range of rugged, stony hills.” Exhausted, he settled in for another frigid night. Now he was frightened, thinking he “was doomed to die of starvation and thirst in the wilderness, my fate remaining a mystery to all my friends.” 

Instead of panicking, however, Selous’s thinking shifted, “a feeling that it was too hard to die thus like a rat in a hole, and though things certainly looked desperate at present, I still felt some gleam of hope that they would eventually come right.”

The cold was not so intense up on the mountain as it had been on the floor of the plain, “nor did I feel the pangs of hunger to any great degree; but my thirst was now intolerable, my throat, tongue, and lips being quite dry and swollen, so that it was very painful to swallow.”        

When he awoke atop the hill he saw that he “commanded a view over a vast extent of country. Suddenly I fancied I recognized a certain detached kopje as the one with which I was well acquainted, close to [the] Shakani vleys.” He felt certain that if he could reach that kopje he would be saved, although it was very far away. He took off walking for it and marched all day, stopping periodically to climb a tree and relocate the landmark, which he couldn’t see from ground level. Though fatigued and weak, he wouldn’t rest for more than a few minutes at a time. At last, just before sundown, he was nearing the Shakani kopje when he saw two native men walking ahead. He called to them as much as his parched throat would allow. They led him to a small kraal consisting of three crude huts. He asked for water, but the old Bushman there would not give him any. “Holding a giraffe’s intestine full of the precious fluid under his arm, [he] said, ‘Buy the water!’” This infuriated Selous, but just then a boy came in carrying a large calabash of fresh goat’s milk. Selous offered his only tradable item, his clasp knife, which the boy accepted. The milk was an indescribable treat, and “about the very best thing I could have taken in my state.”

By the next afternoon he was back with his friends, eating heartily and very glad to be sleeping once again under warm blankets. “Thus terminated an adventure which, had it not been for a sound constitution, might have terminated me,” he wrote. He also noted that it was having the low range of hills and the kopje landmark “well impressed upon my mind” that had probably saved his life. 

As for his horse, which he assumed had died of thirst or fallen prey to lions or hyenas, the hobbled animal had somehow managed to return to the native village where had Selous purchased it. Though in tough shape, its legs cut by the leather thongs, the horse–like young Fred Selous–had found a way to survive.   

Author’s note: This account can be found in Selous’s A Hunter’s Wanderings in Africa, (originally published in 1907, reprinted in 2019), an absorbing memoir of hunting, exploration, and natural history in southern Africa. 

Leave a Comment

Tough Enough for the Tian Shan

The CANIS Pamir Insulation Jacket and Nunavut Rain Jacket and Pants were the ideal layers for a hard mountain hunt.

Photo above: The author wore the Pamir Insulation Jacket from CANIS every day on his hunt in Kazakhstan. This lightweight, packable puffy works well under an outer layer or on its own.

Last fall I hunted maral stag and ibex in the high, rugged mountains of Kazakhstan’s Tian Shan range. Serious prep for this trip started twelve months out, and every item of gear had to be carefully considered. The entire hunt was spent on horseback or on foot, and every night was spent in a tent. It was not a hunt where you could easily dry out your clothes in the evenings. Besides keeping me warm and dry, it was crucial that every item I took on this trip be both lightweight and bombproof. 

In preparation for the trip, I spent some time in the CANIS booth at the DSC convention, where they showed me their layering system. I was impressed with the practicality, light weight, and quality of the workmanship, so I ordered a Pamir Insulation Jacket and a Nunavut Rain Jacket with a matching pair of Nunavut Rain Pants. The real test of this gear, of course, would be in the field.

The Nunavut Rain Jacket and pants are 100 percent waterproof and breathable. This gear is sized to fit over baselayers and insulation layers and is made of a quiet, three-layer fabric ideal as an outer layer for almost any hunt.

The total trip was eighteen hunting days during which I undertook two separate hunts, one for ibex and another for maral stag, the Asian variety of the American elk. Typical variable fall mountain weather was encountered: snow, heavy winds, heavy rain showers, and sometimes very warm periods around midday. Every morning the guides and I got up around 4 am and went to bed between 7 and 8 pm; six or seven hours a day was spent on horses pushing through pine forests and willow-choked creek bottoms. I lost count of how many times my clothing and backpack snagged on branches as we rode. 

For nearly three weeks, the CANIS gear got its workout on a real mountain hunt and passed with flying colors. I lived in it and only took it off when I went to bed.  Actually, one night it got so cold that I got up and put on the Pamir Insulation Jacket, put up the hood, crawled back into the sleeping bag, and slept like a warm bug in a rug! I had the Nunavut Rain Gear with me every day, and if I was not wearing it straight out of camp, it was tied on the horse or stashed in my backpack.  

The CANIS Nunavut Rain Jacket and Pants were an essential layer, providing protection from rain, snow, and wind.

Let’s discuss the rain gear first. The fabric of both the jacket and the pants is a three-layer design with the pants having Kevlar-reinforced knee patches for kneeling or crawling in rough terrain. Taking the jacket and pants on and off was a daily event in the ever-changing weather conditions, and each leg of the pants has full-length, three-headed zippers, enabling me to do this easily while keeping my boots on. Two large pockets in the pants allowed me to carry everything I needed.  The rain jacket has no fewer than seven pockets, including two lower hand-warming pockets, double breast pockets, two upper sleeve pockets, and an interior pocket–more storage than the Russian Army needs! The hood zips close around the face and is adjustable. Both the pants and the jacket are very quiet, comfortably stretchy, and resistant to rips. All seams are sealed and the gear is completely waterproof but also breathable.  

I wore the Pamir Insulation Jacket day and night, both under the Nunavut Rain Jacket and on its own. Filled with a water-repelling, quick-drying synthetic insulation called Climashield APEX, the jacket is very warm while still being light and packable. It has five pockets, including an interior chest pocket for important papers, fleece-lined wrists and collar, and a snug, adjustable hood.  Like the rain gear, this jacket is very rip-resistant.

High-tech, quality clothing like this is not inexpensive, but on a hunt where you depend on your clothing to keep you from being miserable, it’s not just a bargain but worth its weight in gold. Every ounce you carry on a tough mountain hunt has to count, and not only did this clothing keep me dry as a cork during the entire trip, all three pieces, together, weighed just three pounds! If you’re looking for gear that not only performs well but stands up to the rigors of a tough hunt, the lightweight, high-tech clothing from CANIS fits the bill. Learn more at canisathlete.com

The Pamir Insulation Jacket is filled with synthetic Climashield APEX insulation, which is water-resistant and quick drying. The author’s jacket was in Alpha camo; the jacket is also available in solid colors.

Leave a Comment

50 Great Stalks

Craig Boddington’s latest book is a collection of his greatest hunting memories.

I think it’s safe to say that there are few people in the world today with the length, breadth, and depth of hunting experience possessed by Craig Boddington. Craig never claims to have done everything the hunting world has to offer, but he has certainly come closer than almost anyone I can think of. Craig is a mountain hunter extraordinaire and a veteran of scores of African safaris, and he has spent extensive time in the forests and fields of North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and the South Pacific. In fact, over five decades he’s hunted in fifty-six countries, all told. His hunting awards and accolades are too numerous to mention, other than to say they include the incredibly prestigious Weatherby Trophy and the Conklin (“Tough Guy”) Award.

Best of all, Craig has spent his lifetime not only hunting, but also sharing his stories, knowledge, and expertise with those of us who only wish we could spend as much time in the field as he does. In the course of this, he has published some thirty-one books, most of them with specific themes such as Africa, North America, firearms and shooting, or hunting techniques for a single species such as buffalo or elephant. 

Craig’s latest book, 50 Great Stalks: Hunting the World’s Greatest Game Up Close, is something of a departure from those single-themed books. As he says in the Preface, “I guess you could call [this] a ‘hunting highlights’ book, and I suppose I’m old enough to indulge in such.” It’s a collection of half a hundred tales of his most memorable and enjoyable hunts from all around the world. But these are not just any hunts, nor are they chance encounters; they are (almost) all spot-and-stalk adventures. “The more I thought about it,” Craig writes, “I realized that my favorite hunting memories come from identifying a desired animal, then approaching for the shot.”

The book is divided into four parts: Plain, Forest, Skyline Pursuits, and Formidable Game, with a dozen or so stories falling under each heading. Each tale stands on its own and every one of them is a great read, so you can savor this book of hunting adventures cover-to-cover, or flip directly to the section or chapters that most interest you (guilty as charged—I devoured the entire “Skyline Pursuits” section first). These stories take the reader on a fascinating romp through the world’s greatest game fields, ranging from coastal Alaska to the high Pamirs in Tajikistan to the Wyoming prairies to the swamps of Mozambique and beyond. While the stories are not in chronological order, they span several decades, including a tale of Craig’s first safari in Kenya in 1977 and a pronghorn hunt with his father in 1978, and ending with a fun tale of a buffalo hunt on his seventieth birthday in 2022—one that made him late for his own birthday party. 

If you are a fan of Craig’s writing you will recognize the broad outlines of many of these hunts, since he has written about most of them in the pages of Sports Afield and other publications. However, the chapters in this book are not reprints of his magazine articles. In the process of looking back at these adventures, he often adds details and context that were not included in the original stories. As such, through some of these tales you’ll get a taste of how the world of hunting has changed over the years. The book’s ending is inspiration in itself—we should all hope to still be hunting dangerous game (and everything else) as we head into our eighth decade.

It’s hard to pick a favorite among Craig’s many excellent books, since he has an uncanny ability to capture the essence and thrill of big-game hunting in the world’s most exotic places while still making it approachable and enjoyable for the average hunter—and ensuring the reader also learns something along the way. But for sheer variety of subject matter and great storytelling, if you only own one Boddington book, this is the one to get. It’s the one you’ll curl up with and read by the fire as you dream of your own next adventure. Order a signed copy directly from craigboddington.com.

Leave a Comment

Africa’s Toughest Antelope

The wildebeest is often called “the poor man’s Cape buffalo.”

Legend has it that African antelopes are “tougher” than similar-sized animals elsewhere in the world. It’s certainly true that with a full suite of predators to worry about, Africa’s prey species are constantly on edge, ready for that surge of adrenaline that might speed them out of harm’s way.

As for toughness, it varies. I can’t think of an African animal that’s hardier, pound for pound, than an impala. Similar in size to a modest Hill Country whitetail, an impala, when perfectly hit, will consistently travel farther than one thinks it should have been able to. With a poorly hit impala, all bets are off. Zebras are also tough, strongly built, and heavier than most antelopes. The whole oryx-roan-sable clan is tough. To me, spiral horns and the hartebeests are not particularly tough.

To some extent, we’re all victims of our own limited experience. Just one train wreck with an animal, or with a particular cartridge or bullet, tends to make us generalize. After all, that bad experience couldn’t be based on poor shooting, could it? I think most African professional hunters—who have seen lots of terrible shooting by folks like you and me—would agree: The wildebeest is one of Africa’s toughest animals. It’s a big, powerful antelope. Not among the wariest, not the most beautiful, but just plain tough. That doesn’t mean you need a cannon, but you better put your bullet in the right place.

Decades ago, early in my African experience, we were trying to get a big blue wildebeest bull. He was wandering alone and apparently skipped the classes teaching him he was supposed to be stupid. After multiple failed stalks he sauntered across a little clearing and gave us a chance. I was shooting a .340 Weatherby Magnum, which is a cannon. I was certain of the shot, but I was wrong. I know that because we eventually got him, many hours and miles later, after some brilliant tracking. Maybe he took a step on me, maybe I just blew the shot. Whatever happened, I’d hit him just a bit too far back. Doesn’t take much of an error to have a long day with a wildebeest.

Donna Boddington took this blue wildebeest in central Namibia. With horn width well outside the ears and long tips, this is an exceptional bull. She used a Ruger M77 in .30-06.

Years later, on daughter Caroline’s second safari, Scot Burchell glassed a small herd of blue wildebeest feeding on a brushy ridge. We got in close, isolated a nice bull, and Caroline took a shot with her little 7mm-08. I couldn’t see the bull when she shot, only saw dark blue bodies running everywhere. Scot was confident and he was right; her bull didn’t go forty yards, down and dead with a 140-grain bullet centered on the shoulder.

I’ve seen my elder daughter Brittany take several wildebeest with her 7mm-08, and I’ve seen them taken cleanly with the .260 Remington and 6.5 Creedmoor. Always, it’s more important where an animal is hit than what it’s hit with, but wildebeest are tough enough that it’s essential to do it right and use a bullet that is certain to penetrate.

The author believes the Nyasaland wildebeest is the most attractive, with chocolate coat and bright white nose chevron. This bull was taken in Tanzania’s Selous Reserve.

Wildebeest comes from Afrikaans for “wild beast” because of their weird antics. Often referred to as “the poor man’s buffalo,” in build they are bovine-like, and have the buffalo’s toughness. I prefer the nickname “clown of the African veld.” Perceiving a real or imagined threat, a herd will stampede off in their rocking canter for several hundred yards. Then they’re just as likely to come stampeding right back.

Primarily grazers of open plains and edge habitat, there are two distinct species: Connochaetes gnou, the black wildebeest or white-tailed gnu; and C. taurinus, the brindled gnu. The black wildebeest occupied a restricted range in what would become South Africa’s Orange Free State, squarely in the path of the Boer voortrekkers as they departed English rule in Cape Colony.

The black wildebeest nearly became extinct, saved only by a couple of forward-thinking farmers who protected the last survivors. When I first hunted South Africa in 1979, black wildebeest were still scarce, found on few properties in small numbers. Today they’re common in central South Africa and widely introduced into Namibia. The black wildebeest is smaller than the brindled gnu, with bulls about 400 pounds. Coal black with a long white tail, weird vertical forehead brush. Although closely related with hybridization possible, horns of the two species are totally different. Black wildebeest horns grow from a massive boss, forward and down, then curve forward and up, tips near-vertical.

In black wildebeest, you want good heavy bases or bosses, with points that drop well down before turning up, finishing in point reaching nearly to the top of boss. This is a good bull, taken in South Africa with a Musgrave .375 H&H.

The brindled gnu’s horns grow mostly horizontal from heavy bases, tips curving up. Males and females of both species grow similar horns; primary tell-tales are the heavier bases and larger body size of mature males. The brindled gnu is much larger. One reference suggests bulls go up to 900 pounds. I’ve never seen one that big, but I’ll buy 500 to 600 pounds.

From Southern Africa northeast to Kenya there are five recognized subspecies of brindled gnu: blue; Cookson’s; Nyasaland; and Eastern and Western white-bearded wildebeest. Hunters tend to recognize just four, lumping together the two white-bearded races. Horns and body size are generally similar, but coloration varies. Most widespread is the blue wildebeest, found in plains and thornbush habitat across most of Southern Africa. At a distance, the blue wildebeest appears very dark, almost blue. Up closer, the skin is dark gray, typically with vertical black striping. While a shoulder mount of a wildebeest is pure Africa at its finest, the full skin is extremely attractive, and all wildebeests are excellent table fare.

North of the blue wildebeest, Cookson’s wildebeest has the most restrictive range, found only in Zambia’s Luangwa Valley. The striping pattern is more pronounced, again primarily evident on close inspection. To me the Nyasaland wildebeest is the most distinctive and the most attractive with a Hershey-bar chocolate body color and a striking white nose chevron reminiscent of the unrelated spiral-horned antelopes. The Nyasaland wildebeest is found in northern Mozambique and on into southeastern Tanzania, perhaps most plentiful in and around the Selous Reserve.

The author and his son-in-law Brad Jannenga with Brad’s Cookson’s wildebeest, taken in the northern Luangwa Valley. Although blue wildebeest also have this striping effect on their flanks, it’s much more pronounced with the Cookson’s variety.

The Eastern white-bearded wildebeest is the wildebeest of the Serengeti migration. Beards are white or blonde, while dark in all other races. The white-bearded wildebeest is also the lightest in body color, slate gray. The Western race is to the west, no break between. One must assume a hybrid zone, justifying why we hunters lump them together. With Kenya long closed, northern Tanzania is the only place white-bearded wildebeest can be hunted native range. Most of the wildebeest introduced into the US are white-bearded, common on Texas game ranches.

Although plentiful in the wild where they occur, they are not present in all Masailand blocks. The only opportunity I ever had at a white-bearded wildebeest was in 1988. One afternoon on the Simanjaro Plain, along the border of Tarangire National Park, Michel Mantheakis and I ran into a small herd, made a stalk, and took a nice bull.

Of the two species, the black wildebeest is more difficult to judge. You want heavy bosses but, as usual, horn length is more important, so you look for horns that drop well down, then turn up into long tips. Blue wildebeest are simpler: Most hunters look first for outside spread. This is not a record book criterion, but it’s a visible indicator. Much the same as mule deer, with similar numbers: A wildebeest with horns out to ear-tips is probably about 26 inches wide. A couple inches outside the ear-tips and he’s huge, closing on 30 inches wide. Check for big horn bases as the best sign of maturity, just don’t dither too much.

I’ve only taken a couple of black wildebeests, and only one or two each of the northern races. Over the years, I’ve shot a lot of blue wildebeests for camp meat, bait, and culling. I’ve seen few giants. As with most common animals, exceptionally large trophies are rare. In Botswana’s Okavango in 1987, Ronnie MacFarlane said he’d seen an exceptional wildebeest bull. We went looking for him, found him far off across a burned plain. It was difficult to get close, made more difficult because I was shooting an open-sighted .318 Westley Richards.

The rifle shot well, and the front sight was tiny. No way could I see it today, but I could see it back then. I lay down over a pack at 300 yards, put up the 200-yard leaf, and held that tiny bead a bit high on the shoulder. The bull dropped to the shot, which is not common with blue wildebeest. I’m pretty sure that’s the biggest bull I’ve ever taken. For certain, one of the best (or luckiest) shots I’ve ever made.

Leave a Comment

Deer of the Desert Southwest

Hunting the elusive Coues and Carmen Mountain whitetails.

It’s early February and I’m in northern Mexico, one of the best places on Earth in late winter. Mornings are brisk, midday sunny and pleasant under a cloudless sky, bright campfire at night. I’m hunting Coues whitetail, the grey ghost of southern Arizona and northwest Mexico. I’ve been at it for three days, haven’t seen a good buck yet. Maybe I will, maybe I won’t, really don’t care. Love the desert mountains this time of year, and these tricky little deer are one of my all-time favorite pursuits.

Like so many of my generation, I first read about them in Jack O’Connor’s Game in the Desert(Derrydale Press, 1939). The Professor made hunting these crafty little deer sound like so much fun. Today we mostly hunt Coues deer by painstaking glassing. In O’Connor’s Arizona days, they were more commonly hunted by riding horseback through good habitat, jumping deer, and bailing off the horse to get a shot. Late in his life, I was fortunate to know great Coues deer hunter George W. Parker. Between 1926 and 1969, Parker put an amazing seven Coues bucks into B&C’s all-time book. George described his early Coues deer hunting just like O’Connor: Jump-shooting from horseback. I don’t know if there were more deer back then, but I’m sure the shooting was even more difficult than they described. Especially since much of their hunting was with iron sights.

Jack O’Connor with a nice Coues whitetail, circa 1930s. O’Connor’s writing brought some of the first notoriety to Coues deer hunting. Note that his rifle wears iron sights…that was some tough shooting.

I first hunted Coues deer in the fall of 1978, with Marvin and Warner Glenn out of Douglas, Arizona. Marvin is gone, but the Glenn family is still famous for their sturdy riding mules. Although the Glenns did plenty of glassing, I got my first Coues whitetail just as Parker and O’Connor described. Late in the hunt, we were riding up toward a saddle, Marvin in the lead, when he jumped some deer and vaulted off his mule. I hustled, got a quick shot at a nice buck just as he topped out. I rushed the shot, didn’t hit him well, but we caught him moving around a bowl over the rim and I got in a finisher.

I did more hunts with the Glenns, then studied post-graduate Coues deer glassing under great Arizona hunter Duwane Adams. I loved the Arizona hunting, was usually successful…when I drew. Not drawing drove me to Mexico, often with Kirk Kelso. Several times in Chihuahua, more frequently Sonora. The B&C book suggests that the biggest bucks come from Arizona. Probably true, but Arizona is mostly public land and hunting pressure is greater. I’ve never had huge trouble finding Coues deer in Arizona, including recently on BLM land adjoining son-in-law’s ranch north of Phoenix. However, in Mexico, legal nonresident hunting is on private (or communal/tribal) land. Success is higher, average size better, although Arizona’s top end bucks are probably bigger. Whatever, I love to hunt in northern Mexico. Like the feel of the remote ranchos, love the home-cooked Mexican fare, enjoy the people (I wish my Spanish was better).

Army surgeon and naturalist Elliott Coues “discovered” his small, grey deer in the Department of Arizona during the Apache Wars. So different from the “Virginia deer,” it was believed a full separate species well into the Twentieth Century. Today, Odocoileus virginianus couesi is accepted as just one of (arguably) thirty-eight whitetail subspecies, twenty-nine in North and Central America. In Boone & Crockett’s Records of North American Big Game, only the Coues deer is singled out with separate category. Fine by me, but it’s important to appreciate that this special treatment is based on tradition and taxonomic error.

One of Boddington’s best Coues bucks, taken with Kirk Kelso in Sonora in 2002. Even on this typical ten-point, most of the points aren’t perfectly straight, a common characteristic with Coues whitetails.

The Coues deer is not the only whitetail subspecies unique to the American Southwest and northwestern Mexico. The other is the Carmen Mountain whitetail (O. c. carminis), after the Sierra del Carmen range in western Coahuila. This whitetail is not nearly as well-known as the Coues. Safari Club International’s record-keeping system now recognizes it, along with several other Mexico-unique whitetail races, and it’s part of the collection of all of Mexico’s deer, a most difficult task that many Mexican (and a few crazy Americans) strive for.

The carminis, or del Carmen, locally called “fantail” in Texas, is essentially the whitetail of the Big Bend region, the huge Park itself, and peripheries in both Mexico and US. As O’Connor’s writing drew me to Coues deer, it was early reading that drew me to del Carmen, When I was young and only dreaming about this stuff, Hal Swiggett wrote a story about hunting whitetail, desert mule deer, and “fantail” in West Texas. Wow, three kinds of free-range deer in one area? The Carmen Mountains whitetail went on my bucket list, right next to Coues.

Today I know that, even as big as Far West Texas ranches can be, it’s unlikely to have two pure whitetail strains in one place. Almost all whitetail races have broad hybrid zones. Still, the Carmen Mountains whitetail is a real and unique Southwestern deer. In Texas, found in and around the Big Bend National Park. In Mexico, del Carmen has perhaps the smallest range of any of Mexico’s whitetails, restricted to western Coahuila.

North and east, they bump into Texas whitetails; west and south, into Coues deer. Carminis and couesi are both smaller races, hunting conditions much the same, low densities in country with spikey plants, crumbling rock offering terrible footing. Although I’ve done much Coues deer hunting, I know less about del Carmen. However, being that guy, interested in the unusual, I’ve hunted them in both Texas and Coahuila.

Jess Rankin and Boddington with a nice Carmen Mountain whitetail from western Coahuila. Coues and del Carmen are similar, but the Carmen Mountains whitetail is potentially larger, depending on your luck.

We think of them as similar, but this is a disservice to both deer. There are similarities, also differences. Compared to northern whitetails, both have larger ears and outsized tails, for heat dissipation in their warm climate. When raised in alarm, it’s that big, luxurious tail that gives the Carmen Mountains deer its nickname “fantail.”

Del Carmen is larger than the Coues deer and can grow larger antlers. This might seem misleading, because their range in Texas is harsh and dry, almost certainly reducing body size and antler growth. In western Coahuila the country changes dramatically. The Sierra del Carmen range has significant forest, and grassy valleys below are popular for breeding horses. Western Coahuila’s softer country has potential for larger deer.

Visually, the Coues deer is very grey, while the Carmen is brown. It also seems to me that Carmen antlers are more typical, straighter lines and smoother curves, while Coues antlers seem to often form in kinky curves and are rarely perfectly matched one side to the other. In both size and appearance, it seems to make sense that Carmen deer are more like the Texas whitetails they adjoin, while the more distant Coues deer show greater differences.

An above-average Coues buck, good mass but short points and, as is common with Coues, major differences from one side to the other.

My first hunt for del Carmen was with Steve Jones in the Chinati Mountains west of Big Bend. In Texas the fantails share their country with free-range aoudad, so this was a marvelous combo hunt. Lots of aoudad, fewer deer. One afternoon we glassed up a nice eight-pointer. We had him in the spotting scope, waiting to see what he did before making a move. He was walking along a little rimrock far below us and I guess he stepped into a bedded aoudad ram that materialized into the field of view, one of the most amazing sights I’ve seen through a lens. The buck dropped off the rim and out of sight, so I slipped down and shot him.

I went into Coahuila with New Mexico outfitter Jess Rankin. Much different, better-watered country. We saw few deer, although we took a nice buck. Depends on where you are; Mexican friends tell me some ranches have high numbers. One thing the area did have: Plenty of black bears, killing horse foals on that ranch. Among Mexican hunters, it’s axiomatic that black bears and Carmen Mountains whitetails go together.

An exceptionally heavy-antlered Carmen Mountains whitetail, taken in Chihuahua by Boddington’s friend Andres Santos.

Whether carminis or couesi, intensive glassing is the primary technique. Small deer, thinly dispersed in big country. Patient glassing with the biggest and best optics. I’d almost call glassing the only technique. Except: In some situations, waiting over water sources can be effective. I’m at Buelna Ranch in Sonora with my friends, brothers Andres and Santiago Santos. We spend some time at waterholes here. Also, unusually, in this area whitetails are often found out on the desert floor as well as in the hills. So, we do some cruising from high racks for both whitetails and desert mule deer. Still, glassing remains the preferred method. This afternoon we’re going to climb a ridge and glass an enticing canyon until dark. There’s lots of sign–must be a big buck in there. Maybe today will be the day.

Duwane Adams and Boddington with a nice Arizona 8-pointer, early 1980s.

Leave a Comment

Field Tested: Kuiu Women’s PRO Brush Pants and Gila LS Hoodie

The newest additions to Kuiu’s women’s line provide ultimate fit and function for upland hunting and beyond.

I’ve been a fan of Kuiu Ultralight Hunting clothing since 2012, when I admired the high-tech gear my guides were wearing on an Alaska grizzly hunt and asked them what it was. As soon as I got home, I ordered Kuiu’s Attack Pants, Guide Jacket, and rain gear. I still have those original pieces, and they’ve performed beautifully and held up well on countless hunts over the years. Kuiu is best known for building lightweight, technical clothing for mountain hunters, but its product line now includes a full stack of gear for deer hunters, bird hunters, and everyone in between.

When the company came out with a women’s line a few years ago, I was impressed with the features and fit — it had obviously been designed and tested by actual, hard-core women hunters — and the fact that the quality and performance was every bit as good as the men’s gear I’d been wearing for years.

This past fall I had the opportunity to field test a couple of the latest additions to the Kuiu women’s lineup. I wore the new women’s PRO Brush Pant and the lightweight Gila Hoodie on a September dove hunt in eastern Colorado and on a couple of subsequent forays in search of grouse.

Honestly, I used to hate brush pants because most of them are hot, heavy, noisy, and uncomfortable. But the PRO Brush Pants have none of those qualities. Weighing just 19 ounces, they are lightweight, well-fitting, and comfortable. I love that they actually breathe and stretch. Yet they’re super tough, made of densely woven, tear-resistant Primeflex fabric, with reinforced panels on the lower legs, knees, and thighs for extra durability. Everything on the Colorado prairie has thorns and stickers, which the pants sloughed off easily going through numerous fencerows. Nor did they pick up burrs. 

The early September days started out chilly and warmed up fast, and the PRO Brush Pants kept me comfortable throughout. They fit well and look good, but still run large enough to accommodate a light base layer underneath. The zippered, mesh-lined vents on the hip and inner thigh are a great feature—unzip them to help dump body heat when you’re hiking. The pants come with removable suspenders (which I did remove since I prefer a belt), and have two deep front pockets, two large, zippered cargo pockets, and zippered back pockets. The cuffs are reinforced and have a hook that attaches to your boot laces to keep them from riding up when you’re busting though brush.

Lightweight hoodies are the go-to layer these days for hot weather hunting and fishing, and the women’s Gila LS Hoodie paired perfectly with the brush pants during my early-season hunts. With Cool-Touch fabric technology, the Gila Hoodie provides UPF 50+ sun protection as well as anti-odor treatment, and it wicks sweat and dries quickly. Like the pants, the fit is the right mix of streamlined and roomy. Raglan sleeves allow plenty of leeway for swinging a shotgun, and the hood is made to pull over a ball cap if you need to protect your neck and ears from the sun. I’m fairly tall, so I also appreciated the longer length of the body and sleeves, which have thumbholes.

The PRO Brush Pants come in Valo camo or a solid color, ash; and in the hoodie you have a choice of Valo, Verde, or Vias camo, or solid bone.

What’s great about both of these pieces is not only will I get a lot of use out of them for bird hunting, but they’re also going to be ideal for early season big-game hunts, especially pronghorn. Oh, and the Gila Hoodie is turning out to be an excellent fishing shirt as well. I highly recommend them both. Learn more and order direct at kuiu.com.

The author in the dove field wearing Kuiu’s Women’s Gila LS Hoodie and Women’s PRO Brush Pants, both in Valo camo.

Leave a Comment

Beyond Bucks and Bulls

Improve your hunting skills and do your part for wildlife management by filling a doe or cow elk tag.

Photo above: Calling in this cow elk on public land in Colorado made for an exciting and memorable hunt. Photo by Trail’s End Media

It was a beautiful fall morning in the Colorado high country. I was sitting with my back against a tree, rifle across my knees, watching as dawn slowly brightened a grassy opening that was ringed with the brilliant gold of aspen trees at the height of their autumn glory.

A piercing bugle sounded from somewhere behind me. A real bull, I wondered, or another hunter? This was national forest land, and there were plenty of other hunters around, so I couldn’t be sure. I sat still and waited. From roughly that same direction came a series of chirps and mews. Cow elk. I sat up straighter. Maybe there were actual elk close by.

My husband, Scott, was sitting against another tree about ten yards behind me, facing in the opposite direction. I was the one with the either-sex elk tag, so he held a call instead of a rifle. He had heard the cow-chirps, too, so he let out one of his own.

The forest was silent for a few minutes, and then he chirped again, softly. Almost instantly, there was a crashing noise and a rustling of leaves, followed by Scott’s low warning: “Elk coming!” 

The rifle came to my cheek as I caught a flash of movement from my left. Two cow elk trotted past me, just fifty yards away. I was glad I had turned my scope to its lowest setting. I quickly verified that neither animal had antlers, then swung the cross hairs to the front of the lead elk’s chest and fired. She stumbled, ran forward, and stopped broadside a hundred yards away. I racked the bolt and put a second round through the center of her shoulder, and she dropped in her tracks as the second elk vanished through the trees. 

I watched the elk in the scope for a few moments to ensure she wasn’t moving, put the rifle on safety, and then got shakily to my feet, the adrenaline rush still surging. Scott and I looked at each other, wide-eyed. “Wow, that was exciting!” he said.

“You’re not kidding!” I said. “I guess now we know you can call in cow elk just like bulls!”

I wish anyone who thinks a hunt for an antlerless animal can’t be an adrenaline-filled experience could have been with us that morning. Most hunters understand the idea of hunting antlerless elk and deer for meat, but many of them dismiss hunts for does and cows as “too easy” or “not very exciting.” I beg to differ on both points.

Several years ago I was hunting on a snow-covered ridgetop in northern Pennsylvania in early December. I had both a buck and a doe tag in my pocket, and I had been out for several days without getting a shot at either one. I had seen numerous deer, but in this thickly forested region, visibility is rarely more than fifty or sixty yards. That means, unless you sit very still or move with great stealth, deer are going to see you long before you see them.  

Still-hunting, or moving very quietly through deer habitat, is a time-honored tradition in this area, and it was a favorite method for old-timers like my dad, who never liked to be stuck in a stand all day. It’s a fascinating and effective way to hunt, but it’s also incredibly difficult. That season, I was determined to pull it off, but I was having trouble making myself move slowly enough. I was working hard to stay quiet and keep the wind in my favor; nevertheless, I was continually bumping deer. Every time I got close, I’d peer through the trees and see white tails waving goodbye as their owners bounded away.

That afternoon, something happened. I finally made myself slow way down, moving just two or three steps at a time, then stopping to glass for several minutes. I actually got so focused I lost track of time, so I have no idea how long I had been in this groove when I spotted the tip of a deer’s ear sticking out from behind a tree on the hillside below me. There were two does browsing on some beech brush, completely unaware of my presence. I dropped one with a single shot at fifty yards, then tobogganed down the snowy slope to put my hands on her warm hide. It may have been “just” a doe, but I still consider that successful still-hunt one of my favorite hunting experiences.

The author sneaked up on this whitetail doe by still-hunting along a snowy ridgetop in northern Pennsylvania. Photo by Trail’s End Media

According to the National Deer Association (NDA), most states need to increase their doe harvest. In places where there are more deer than the habitat can support for optimal health of both the animals and the land, hunters can improve their region’s trophy buck potential by shooting more does. It seems paradoxical to buck-only hunters, many of whom can’t understand how taking does can actually strengthen a deer herd and even improve their chances at a good buck. The NDA explains that where there are large numbers of deer, taking some does out improves the health and nutrition of the remaining animals. It also balances the buck-to-doe ratio, which means bucks must move around more during the rut–so hunters are more likely to see them.

According to the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, there are also excellent management reasons for taking a cow elk. Reducing an elk herd to fit the carrying capacity of its winter range is important to the long-term health of elk and elk habitat, and taking a cow elk instead of a bull is an effective way to do this. Wildlife agencies issue either-sex tags specifically to encourage hunters to take cows. If more hunters were willing to kill cows in areas where biologists have identified the need to do so, the herds would be healthier and the bull numbers would actually increase. (Taking a cow elk usually also makes the local ranchers happy.) 

As I can attest after a long day of packing out my cow elk, these animals provide plenty of excellent eating. A mature cow will yield 150 pounds or more of edible meat. On my cow elk hunt, Scott and I used all the same skills we use on our quests for bulls: identifying good elk habitat, figuring out the terrain, hiking, glassing, calling, making the shot, and of course quartering, boning, and packing out a whole lot of meat.

You may think of cows and does as less wary than their male counterparts, but that’s not necessarily the case. As with all wild animals, they have keenly developed senses, and while you may get lucky, especially in areas where they are abundant, hunting them is not necessarily easy. 

Some states, including Colorado and Montana, even issue limited-draw tags for bighorn ewes. This surprised me when I learned about it, since bighorn sheep are hardly overabundant, and bighorn ram tags are among the most highly coveted of all big-game licenses. But in some regions, there are solid management reasons for hunters to take a few female animals out of the sheep population. 

The unit where I hunted my bighorn ram in southwestern Colorado is a good example. In 2023, the state issued 14 ram tags and 7 ewe tags for that unit. When I spoke with Jamin Grigg, Southwest Region Senior Biologist for Colorado Parks & Wildlife, he explained that sheep in this area, as in many areas of the West, are “managed for separation.” Although the population is healthy, the threat of disease transmission from domestic sheep herds that graze in the area is a major concern. If bighorn numbers increase too much, they are more likely to come into contact with domestic sheep and contract a highly contagious pneumonia that could spread through the herd. 

“We issue ewe tags partly to give hunters increased opportunity, but mostly to mitigate the risk of contact with domestic sheep,” he explained. Now that I know how delicious the meat of bighorn sheep is, and how magical it is to spend time in sheep country with rifle in hand, I would seriously consider applying for a ewe tag.

Hunts for the females of a species build your hunting skills, fill your memory banks, stock your freezer, and improve the health of herds. Tags are often easier to draw and less expensive than those for bucks and bulls, and you’ll gain valuable intel about the game in your chosen hunting area. As a bonus, taking a doe or a cow this year could lead to more and bigger bucks and bulls next year.

Leave a Comment

A Scope for All Seasons

Leica’s Amplus 6 3-18x44i is a robust scope with a sleek look and high-end features that belie its affordable price point.

When you have the opportunity to use high-end scopes and binoculars, as I’m often fortunate to do, you get spoiled—fast. There’s nothing like the razor-sharp views and light-gathering capabilities of premium optics. The problem, of course, is the sticker shock. Premium comes at a price—and while such optics are unquestionably worth what they cost, owning a scope that costs well north of $2,000 is not doable for everyone. So I was intrigued a few years ago when Leica—one of the top makers of high-end European optics—came out with a scope called the Amplus 6, which it touts as an “attractive entry into the premium class.”

The version I tested during two whitetail hunts last fall was the 3-18x44i model with the L4w BDC MOA reticle. This scope has a list price of $1,499, but a quick internet search finds it retailing for $1,199 at EuroOptic.com. Despite the price point, the Amplus 6 incorporates Leica’s proven optics technology, including top-quality lenses with 90 percent light transmission, state-of-the-art coatings, and a shock-resistant aluminum housing.

Despite its billing as a no-frills optic, the Amplus 6 is a sleek scope with the same high-end look and feel of other Leica scopes I’ve used. With a 30mm main tube, this model weighs 23 ounces—not ultra-lightweight by any means, but certainly trim enough to ride well on most hunting rifles. The glass is incredibly clear and the L4w reticle is sharp and uncluttered, with elevation and wind hold markings in MOA. It sits in the second focal plane so it stays the same size regardless of magnification. Cross hair thickness is 0.8 cm. In a word, it’s precise. The reticle also features an extra-fine (0.6 cm) illuminated dot with ten manually adjustable levels of brightness. The dot is small enough that it won’t obscure even a distant target and has no annoying glare.

I mounted this scope on a Ruger American Gen II rifle and took it to the range, and one of the first things I noticed was its exceptionally wide field of view at the lower powers. When I turned the magnification down to 3x and studied my target, I had an unusually broad view downrange. The other thing I appreciated was the generous eye relief—a big plus for a hunter who may need to take a shot from an odd angle in the field.

The 6 in Amplus 6 obviously stands for 6x zoom. The 3-18x magnification range is perfect for a wide range of hunting styles. While I kept it set on 6x during my Pennsylvania deer hunt, I cranked it up to 12x when I found myself in a tree stand in Missouri where I could see out to 400 yards—and I was glad to know there was more magnification available if I needed it. The 44mm objective lens allows for a large exit pupil while keeping the scope from being overly bulky.

This is a “no frills” scope only if you don’t consider an elevation turret, adjustable parallax, and illuminated dot to be “frills”—which I guess, these days, they aren’t. 

Leica’s BDC system lets you adjust the reticle so you can quickly dial to various shooting distances. The elevation turret features very solid, audible one-quarter-MOA clicks and large, easy-to-read numbers, and it tracks with great accuracy.

The elevation turret features solid one-quarter-MOA clicks and easy-to-read numbers. On the left-hand side of the scope the parallax adjustment ring sits next to the light-level settings for the illuminated reticle dot.

The turret also has a mechanical zero stop. After a quick online search, I found a YouTube video explaining how to set it up. It’s easy. There are two knurled rings on the elevation turret. After sighting in, hold the bottom one while unscrewing the top one. Once you remove the top cap, pull straight up to expose the interior of the turret. Loosen three screws with the included Allen wrench and turn the turret clockwise until the zero stop engages. Tighten the screws, replace the turret and cap, and you’re done. It’s one of the easiest-to-adjust turrets I’ve used.

On the left side of the scope is a parallax adjustment ring with a range of twenty yards to infinity. On the same left-side turret there are ten light-level settings for the illuminated reticle dot that alternate on and off. The windage adjustment is a capped turret you can turn by hand and has the same one-quarter-MOA adjustments the elevation turret does.

There’s no doubt this scope is robust. It took a few knocks during my fall hunts, including a couple of times when I was raising and lowering the rifle on a rope from my tree stand and I cringed as it banged a little too hard against the ladder. But my zero never budged.

Leica offers an impressive transferable warranty on optics sold in the USA and Canada. Their 30-year manufacturer’s warranty guarantees against defects in the optical system and their 10-year Passport Protection Plan promises to repair or replace your scope if it is damaged or becomes defective. 

With excellent light transmission, wide field of view, precise tracking, tough construction, and that fantastic warranty, there’s no doubt the Amplus 6 is a true premium scope—without the premium price.—Diana Rupp

Leave a Comment

A Big Win for Wildlife

The defeat of Proposition 127 in Colorado is a blueprint for saving science-based wildlife management throughout North America.

Photo above by VictorSchendelPhotography.com

This past November, the North American hunting community celebrated a potentially game-changing victory with the defeat of Proposition 127 in Colorado, a measure that would have permanently banned the hunting of mountain lions and bobcats statewide. Despite Colorado’s heavily urban voter base and the backing of a powerful group of anti-hunting activists that outspent the pro-hunting side 2 to 1, the ballot measure not only went down, it failed by a fairly decisive margin of almost 10 percent.

When I first became aware of the issue in fall 2023, I assumed, as many other hunters did, that science-based wildlife management would come out on the losing end of this latest attempt at ballot-box biology, just as it had with Colorado’s voter-mandated wolf reintroduction in 2020. Instead, something very interesting happened. For the first time I can remember, I saw hunters come together in an organized way with a purpose and a plan.

A nucleus of determined people who believe in the benefits of hunting and scientific wildlife management joined forces to counter the emotion-filled falsehoods of the anti-hunters. They united behind an organization called Coloradoans for Responsible Wildlife Management (CRWM), led by the bearded and indefatigable Dan Gates.

Awareness of the issue spread rapidly throughout the Colorado hunting community, and by the time elk season was underway, thousands of volunteer-created “No on 127” signs sprouted along Colorado roadsides, with messages like “Let Scientists, Not Activists, Manage Wildlife.”

There were many facets to the success of the opposition to 127 that other states can learn from when — not if — anti-hunting groups attempt to disrupt their hunts. On a recent episode of the Hunter Conservationist podcast, Charles Whitwam and Mike Costello of HOWL for Wildlife, an organization that has helped beat back recent anti-hunting initiatives in several states, discussed what worked.

They noted that it was important to have focused, consistent messaging. Outreach to urban communities was critical, and this was done through social media, advertising, and, interestingly, face-to-face contact. The campaign actually set up tables in downtown Denver and Boulder and talked to passers-by, with surprisingly positive results.

One of Whitwam’s remarks that stood out to me was this: “This whole war is won through public education.” He explained that the vast majority of people, especially in the cities, know absolutely nothing about hunting. They are not automatically against it; they just know nothing about it. Once they hear from hunters, they start to understand that wildlife is managed under a carefully regulated, science-based system, and that the information they are getting from the other side is not trustworthy.

The bottom line, and what the majority of Colorado voters ended up agreeing on, is that decisions about wildlife management should be made by biologists and state agencies — Colorado Parks & Wildlife, in this case — not by voters.

As hunters celebrate this win, anti-hunting groups are continuing their efforts in Colorado and elsewhere. We now know the hunting community is capable of effective action. So the next time the antis try to come for our hunting licenses, we know we can beat them. We need to be ready.

Leave a Comment

Spartan Javelin Pro Hunt Tac Bipod and Ascent Tripod

Lightweight and rock-steady, these are game-changers for backcountry hunting.

Photo above: The Javelin Pro bipod is lightweight, easily adjustable, and quick to deploy.

For years I was not a big fan of having a bipod on my hunting rifle. Most of the ones I tried were heavy, clunky, and noisy to deploy. And of course, you can only use them when shooting prone, which isn’t always possible depending on the terrain and the game you’re hunting. Instead, I generally rely on using my pack for a rest when shooting prone, and carry some sort of tripod or shooting sticks on which to rest my rifle if I end up shooting from a sitting or kneeling position. But good shooting sticks can also be heavy and unwieldy. So when I first heard about Spartan Precision’s range of lightweight bipods and tripods using a quick-detach system, I was intrigued. 

Designed specifically for backcountry hunters, the system uses rare-earth magnets to quickly and securely mount rifles and optics to a versatile range of ultralight carbon-fiber bipods and tripods. Built for simplicity and low maintenance, the system is easy and quick to use and ideal for any hunt where you are doing a lot of hiking don’t want to carry too much weight, but might need to shoot from a variety of field positions.

The first step is to attach one of Spartan’s adapters to your rifle. Spartan offers a range of adapters compatible with a wide selection of rifles. They call their system MagnaSwitch, and once you have an adapter on your rifle or optic, you can attach any of the compatible accessories since they all use the same attachment system. 

The Classic Rifle Adapter is a no-brainer to install; I put it on a Remington 700 .25-06 in a couple of minutes. Just unscrew the front sling swivel stud from your rifle’s fore-end and replace it with the adapter, which consists of the rare-earth magnet and a sling attachment behind it (so you can still attach your sling). The adapter kit comes with several different screws; pick the one that most closely matches the sling-swivel stud on your rifle, tighten it up, and you’re done.

Note that the Classic Adapter works on a lot of different types of rifles, but not all. It worked perfectly on the Remington 700, but it didn’t work on my Ruger American. However, Spartan offers a wide variety of different adapters for different rifle platforms, including Picatinny, M-Lok, and Arca adapters, as well as one called the Classic Gunsmith Adapter that will work on my Ruger, but must be installed by a gunsmith. Spartan Precision’s website has a list of rifles that work with the DIY-friendly Classic Adapter.

Spartan’s Classic Rifle Adapter is easy to install. Just remove your rifle’s sling swivel stud and replace it with the adapter.

I couldn’t believe how light the Javelin Pro Hunt Tac Bipod was when I first picked it up. Made of aluminum and carbon fiber, it weighs just 7.6 ounces, and the legs extend from 7 to 9 inches. You can adjust the height easily with one hand. Tungsten tips with tethered rubber boots lets it sit on pretty much any surface without slipping.

Once I’d installed the adapter on my .25-06, the bipod was super easy to attach and detach. You just place it in the adapter and the rare earth magnet pulls it tight. It does take a little practice to slip it in without making a loud click, and that’s definitely something you’ll want to practice before you hunt with it so you can do it as quietly as possible without alerting the game (it will still go click, but more softly). Removing the bipod is just a matter of grasping it and pulling firmly downward. I love being able to have a bipod with me without having it hanging off the fore-end of my rifle all the time. (Spartan also sells a handy holster for it so you can keep it on your belt.)

The bipod has two modes, which you control depending on which way you attach it to your rifle. In hunting mode, the bipod rotates so you can track moving game. In target mode, it’s locked in and won’t move. Even in hunting mode, it’s incredibly steady. I shot better groups with the .25-06 with the Javelin Pro off my prone mat at the range than I did off the bench.

The Ascent Tripod is even more impressive, and to me, more useful for most of the hunting I do. But the best part is I can have both the bipod and the tripod along with me on any given hunt, since they use the same adapter. When I click the .25-06 on the tripod and drop into a sitting position behind it, I feel rock-solid. The tripod has a wide range of elevation and cant adjustments, and four different leg-pitch positions. 

Like the bipod, the legs have tungsten carbide tips with tethered synthetic boots, and I couldn’t make them slip anywhere I set it up, no matter the terrain. The Mountain version of the tripod that I have extends to as tall as 50 inches and can go down as low as 11 inches. You can use the tripod for your spotting scope or binocular as well; you just need to install Spartan Precision’s Heavy Duty Optics Adapter.

No tripod is ultralight, but this one is as close as it gets at just over three pounds. Another neat feature is that you can detach the legs and use them as trekking poles. Spartan sells pole handles with wrist loops that attach easily to the tripod legs. Simply unscrew a tripod leg, screw in the handle, and you’ve got a nicer set of trekking poles than almost any on the market—without having added another piece of gear to your kit.

When you’re shooting at a game animal, you owe it to yourself and your quarry to make a clean kill. The Spartan Precision system is the niftiest and most practical setup I’ve ever seen for backcountry hunting. It has everything you need to get into a rock-steady field position and make that first shot count—without hauling a bunch of extra weight in the process. Learn more at javelinbipod.com.—Diana Rupp

The Ascent Tripod makes for a solid shooting platform. As a bonus, the legs can be quickly detached and used as trekking poles.

Leave a Comment

tablet

Never Miss An Issue!Subscribe Now: 6 Issues for $34.97

More Details
WordPress Video Lightbox Plugin